California · County service area
4.9 Google Rated Law FirmEmployment Attorney in Los Angeles County, CA
Los Angeles County workers file more wage and civil rights claims than anywhere else in California, and the county's employment landscape — production crews, port and warehouse logistics, garment shops, hotels, and home care — produces most of the violations the Labor Code was written for. The same rules apply whether you are paid hourly, on salary, by the day, or on a 1099.
Day rates, flat weekly salaries, and 'independent contractor' paperwork are common across Los Angeles County production, delivery, and garment work, and none of them removes overtime. A salary alone never makes a worker exempt; the duties and the salary threshold must both be met under Cal. Lab. Code § 515 and 29 C.F.R. Part 541, and a 1099 label is measured against the ABC test in Cal. Lab. Code § 2775 and Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court, 4 Cal. 5th 903 (2018).
Cities we serve
- Los Angeles
- Long Beach
- Glendale
- Santa Clarita
- Lancaster
- Palmdale
- Pomona
- Torrance
- Pasadena
- El Monte
Where claims are filed
- Los Angeles Superior Court — Stanley Mosk Courthouse
- Spring Street Courthouse (complex civil)
- Van Nuys, Long Beach, and Pomona courthouses
- U.S. District Court, Central District of California
- Labor Commissioner (DLSE) wage claim
- Civil Rights Department (CRD) complaint
- EEOC charge for federal claims
Common industries
- Entertainment and production crews
- Garment and apparel manufacturing
- Port, trucking, and warehouse logistics
- Hotels, restaurants, and events
- Health care and home care
- Security and janitorial services
Unpaid wages, overtime, and breaks
California pays overtime by the day as well as by the week, and unpaid time adds penalties on top of the wages themselves.
- Time and a half after 8 hours in a workday and after 40 in a workweek, double time after 12 hours in a day, under Cal. Lab. Code § 510. Federal overtime after 40 hours is separately owed under 29 U.S.C. § 207(a).
- A 30-minute off-duty meal period is required before the end of the fifth hour under Cal. Lab. Code § 512, and each missed or interrupted meal or rest period costs one extra hour of pay under Cal. Lab. Code § 226.7. Rest breaks must be genuinely off duty, Augustus v. ABM Security Services, Inc., 2 Cal. 5th 257 (2016).
- Small increments of off-the-clock work still count: California rejects the federal de minimis defense for regularly occurring minutes, Troester v. Starbucks Corp., 5 Cal. 5th 829 (2018), and time under employer control, including bag checks, is hours worked, Frlekin v. Apple Inc., 8 Cal. 5th 1038 (2020).
- Overtime is calculated on the regular rate, which includes most non-discretionary bonuses, Alvarado v. Dart Container Corp., 4 Cal. 5th 542 (2018).
- Late final pay carries waiting-time penalties of up to 30 days of wages under Cal. Lab. Code § 203, defective pay stubs carry penalties under Cal. Lab. Code § 226, and work expenses such as personal phone and vehicle use must be reimbursed under Cal. Lab. Code § 2802.
- If you were paid on a 1099 but worked like an employee, the ABC test in Cal. Lab. Code § 2775 presumes employee status, and misclassification carries employer penalties of $5,000 to $25,000 per violation under Cal. Lab. Code § 226.8.
Wrongful termination and retaliation
California is an at-will state, but firing someone for an unlawful reason is still actionable.
- An employer may not fire or punish you for reporting what you reasonably believe is a violation of law, Cal. Lab. Code § 1102.5, and the employer carries a clear-and-convincing burden under Cal. Lab. Code § 1102.6 once you show retaliation was a contributing factor, Lawson v. PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc., 12 Cal. 5th 703 (2022).
- Retaliation for complaining about wages or filing a wage claim is separately unlawful under Cal. Lab. Code § 98.6, and for federal wage complaints under 29 U.S.C. § 215(a)(3).
- Raising a workplace health or safety concern is protected under Cal. Lab. Code § 6310.
- Termination that violates a fundamental public policy supports a common-law claim, Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 27 Cal. 3d 167 (1980).
- Discipline, schedule cuts, or a sudden negative review after a complaint can be adverse action, not just firing, Yanowitz v. L'Oreal USA, Inc., 36 Cal. 4th 1028 (2005).
Discrimination and harassment
FEHA covers California employers with five or more employees, and harassment claims reach employers of any size.
- It is unlawful to discriminate based on race, national origin, religion, sex, pregnancy, gender identity, sexual orientation, age (40 and over), disability, or medical condition under Cal. Gov. Code § 12940(a); federal claims arise under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2.
- Harassment does not have to be severe to be actionable: a single incident can suffice if it unreasonably interferes with work, and the legislature rejected the 'stray remarks' approach in Cal. Gov. Code § 12923.
- Harassment liability under FEHA applies to employers regardless of employee count, and to individual harassers, under Cal. Gov. Code § 12940(j).
- A complaint must generally be filed with the Civil Rights Department within three years of the last violation under Cal. Gov. Code § 12960(e); the federal EEOC deadline in California is 300 days under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(1).
- Mixed-motive cases still allow relief where a protected trait was a substantial motivating factor, Harris v. City of Santa Monica, 56 Cal. 4th 203 (2013).
Leave, disability, and accommodation
Getting hurt, getting sick, or having a baby is not a lawful reason to lose your job.
- Employers must provide reasonable accommodation for a disability and engage in a good-faith interactive process under Cal. Gov. Code § 12940(m)–(n).
- California Family Rights Act leave of up to 12 weeks applies to employers with five or more employees under Cal. Gov. Code § 12945.2; federal FMLA leave applies at 50 or more employees under 29 U.S.C. § 2612.
- Pregnancy disability leave of up to four months is separate from CFRA leave under Cal. Gov. Code § 12945.
- Paid sick leave accrues and may be used without retaliation under Cal. Lab. Code §§ 246 and 246.5.
- Work injuries are covered by workers' compensation, and retaliating against a worker for filing a claim is unlawful under Cal. Lab. Code § 132a.
Common questions
- My employer calls me a contractor. Am I still owed overtime?
- Probably yes. California presumes employee status unless the hiring business satisfies all three prongs of the ABC test in Cal. Lab. Code § 2775. Misclassification typically adds claims rather than removing them, including penalties of $5,000 to $25,000 per violation under Cal. Lab. Code § 226.8.
- I was fired after complaining to HR. What can I do?
- Retaliation for reporting what you reasonably believe is unlawful is prohibited by Cal. Lab. Code § 1102.5, and once you show your report was a contributing factor the employer must prove by clear and convincing evidence it would have acted anyway, Cal. Lab. Code § 1102.6; Lawson v. PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc., 12 Cal. 5th 703 (2022).
Other Southern California counties we serve
Talk to Marshall Rosenbach about your job
Tell us what happened and we will tell you which claims the facts support and what the deadlines are. Cases are handled on a contingency-fee basis; you may still owe costs and expenses regardless of the outcome.
Attorney Advertising. This page is general legal information about California employment law, not legal advice about your situation. Using this site or submitting a case review request does not create an attorney-client relationship; no relationship is formed until a written fee agreement is signed. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Responsible attorney: Marshall E. Rosenbach.