California · County service area
4.9 Google Rated Law FirmEmployment Attorney in Imperial County, CA
Imperial County's winter vegetable season, border logistics, and geothermal energy work create long days, early crew-bus departures, and heat exposure. Time spent under employer control before the field is reached is frequently unpaid, and it is frequently compensable.
Employer-mandated travel matters here. Time spent riding employer-required transportation to a worksite is hours worked in California, Morillion v. Royal Packing Co., 22 Cal. 4th 575 (2000). Agricultural overtime thresholds are set by Cal. Lab. Code § 860, and outdoor crews are protected by the heat-illness standard, 8 C.C.R. § 3395.
Cities we serve
- El Centro
- Calexico
- Brawley
- Imperial
- Holtville
- Westmorland
- Calipatria
- Seeley
- Heber
- Niland
Where claims are filed
- Imperial County Superior Court — El Centro
- U.S. District Court, Southern District of California
- Labor Commissioner (DLSE) wage claim
- Civil Rights Department (CRD) complaint
- EEOC charge for federal claims
Common industries
- Winter vegetable agriculture
- Cross-border logistics and produce
- Geothermal and renewable energy
- Government and correctional facilities
- Health care
- Retail and food service
Unpaid wages, overtime, and breaks
California pays overtime by the day as well as by the week, and unpaid time adds penalties on top of the wages themselves.
- Time and a half after 8 hours in a workday and after 40 in a workweek, double time after 12 hours in a day, under Cal. Lab. Code § 510. Federal overtime after 40 hours is separately owed under 29 U.S.C. § 207(a).
- A 30-minute off-duty meal period is required before the end of the fifth hour under Cal. Lab. Code § 512, and each missed or interrupted meal or rest period costs one extra hour of pay under Cal. Lab. Code § 226.7. Rest breaks must be genuinely off duty, Augustus v. ABM Security Services, Inc., 2 Cal. 5th 257 (2016).
- Small increments of off-the-clock work still count: California rejects the federal de minimis defense for regularly occurring minutes, Troester v. Starbucks Corp., 5 Cal. 5th 829 (2018), and time under employer control, including bag checks, is hours worked, Frlekin v. Apple Inc., 8 Cal. 5th 1038 (2020).
- Overtime is calculated on the regular rate, which includes most non-discretionary bonuses, Alvarado v. Dart Container Corp., 4 Cal. 5th 542 (2018).
- Late final pay carries waiting-time penalties of up to 30 days of wages under Cal. Lab. Code § 203, defective pay stubs carry penalties under Cal. Lab. Code § 226, and work expenses such as personal phone and vehicle use must be reimbursed under Cal. Lab. Code § 2802.
- If you were paid on a 1099 but worked like an employee, the ABC test in Cal. Lab. Code § 2775 presumes employee status, and misclassification carries employer penalties of $5,000 to $25,000 per violation under Cal. Lab. Code § 226.8.
Wrongful termination and retaliation
California is an at-will state, but firing someone for an unlawful reason is still actionable.
- An employer may not fire or punish you for reporting what you reasonably believe is a violation of law, Cal. Lab. Code § 1102.5, and the employer carries a clear-and-convincing burden under Cal. Lab. Code § 1102.6 once you show retaliation was a contributing factor, Lawson v. PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc., 12 Cal. 5th 703 (2022).
- Retaliation for complaining about wages or filing a wage claim is separately unlawful under Cal. Lab. Code § 98.6, and for federal wage complaints under 29 U.S.C. § 215(a)(3).
- Raising a workplace health or safety concern is protected under Cal. Lab. Code § 6310.
- Termination that violates a fundamental public policy supports a common-law claim, Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 27 Cal. 3d 167 (1980).
- Discipline, schedule cuts, or a sudden negative review after a complaint can be adverse action, not just firing, Yanowitz v. L'Oreal USA, Inc., 36 Cal. 4th 1028 (2005).
Discrimination and harassment
FEHA covers California employers with five or more employees, and harassment claims reach employers of any size.
- It is unlawful to discriminate based on race, national origin, religion, sex, pregnancy, gender identity, sexual orientation, age (40 and over), disability, or medical condition under Cal. Gov. Code § 12940(a); federal claims arise under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2.
- Harassment does not have to be severe to be actionable: a single incident can suffice if it unreasonably interferes with work, and the legislature rejected the 'stray remarks' approach in Cal. Gov. Code § 12923.
- Harassment liability under FEHA applies to employers regardless of employee count, and to individual harassers, under Cal. Gov. Code § 12940(j).
- A complaint must generally be filed with the Civil Rights Department within three years of the last violation under Cal. Gov. Code § 12960(e); the federal EEOC deadline in California is 300 days under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(1).
- Mixed-motive cases still allow relief where a protected trait was a substantial motivating factor, Harris v. City of Santa Monica, 56 Cal. 4th 203 (2013).
Leave, disability, and accommodation
Getting hurt, getting sick, or having a baby is not a lawful reason to lose your job.
- Employers must provide reasonable accommodation for a disability and engage in a good-faith interactive process under Cal. Gov. Code § 12940(m)–(n).
- California Family Rights Act leave of up to 12 weeks applies to employers with five or more employees under Cal. Gov. Code § 12945.2; federal FMLA leave applies at 50 or more employees under 29 U.S.C. § 2612.
- Pregnancy disability leave of up to four months is separate from CFRA leave under Cal. Gov. Code § 12945.
- Paid sick leave accrues and may be used without retaliation under Cal. Lab. Code §§ 246 and 246.5.
- Work injuries are covered by workers' compensation, and retaliating against a worker for filing a claim is unlawful under Cal. Lab. Code § 132a.
Common questions
- Do I get paid for the crew bus ride to the field?
- If your employer requires you to use its transportation, that travel time is compensable in California, Morillion v. Royal Packing Co., 22 Cal. 4th 575 (2000).
- Can I be fired for reporting unsafe heat conditions?
- No. Retaliation for a health or safety complaint violates Cal. Lab. Code § 6310, and the underlying heat protections are in 8 C.C.R. § 3395.
Other Southern California counties we serve
Talk to Marshall Rosenbach about your job
Tell us what happened and we will tell you which claims the facts support and what the deadlines are. Cases are handled on a contingency-fee basis; you may still owe costs and expenses regardless of the outcome.
Attorney Advertising. This page is general legal information about California employment law, not legal advice about your situation. Using this site or submitting a case review request does not create an attorney-client relationship; no relationship is formed until a written fee agreement is signed. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Responsible attorney: Marshall E. Rosenbach.